|
|
| Views: 2,471 |
| Join Fan Club |
| Send A Note |
| Add Review |
| Join Mailing List |
| Gender: Female |
| Member Since: 5/2/2001 |
| Location: Seattle, WA |
|
| |
 |
|
TOPIC
DETAIL |
|
 |
| Posted
on 9/9/2008 11:52:59 AM
with 0
replies |
|
Sarah Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Hillary Clinton. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.
By Gloria Steinem
September 4, 2008
Here's the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that even the anti-feminist right wing -- the folks with a headlock on the Republican Party -- are trying to appease the gender gap with a first-ever female vice president. We owe this to women -- and to many men too -- who have picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted violence at the polls so women can vote. We owe it to Shirley Chisholm, who first took the "white-male-only" sign off the White House, and to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who hung in there through ridicule and misogyny to win 18 million votes.
But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie.
Photos: Sarah Palin, north starJoin the reader discussion on Gloria Steinem's Op-Ed article
Sarah Palin as Alaska National Guard commander
Palin appears to disagree with McCain on sex education
Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton. Her down-home, divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a Republican convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as female, a presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing and a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton's candidacy stood for -- and that Barack Obama's still does. To vote in protest for McCain/Palin would be like saying, "Somebody stole my shoes, so I'll amputate my legs."
This is not to beat up on Palin. I defend her right to be wrong, even on issues that matter most to me. I regret that people say she can't do the job because she has children in need of care, especially if they wouldn't say the same about a father. I get no pleasure from imagining her in the spotlight on national and foreign policy issues about which she has zero background, with one month to learn to compete with Sen. Joe Biden's 37 years' experience.
Palin has been honest about what she doesn't know. When asked last month about the vice presidency, she said, "I still can't answer that question until someone answers for me: What is it exactly that the VP does every day?" When asked about Iraq, she said, "I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq."
She was elected governor largely because the incumbent was unpopular, and she's won over Alaskans mostly by using unprecedented oil wealth to give a $1,200 rebate to every resident. Now she is being praised by McCain's campaign as a tax cutter, despite the fact that Alaska has no state income or sales tax. Perhaps McCain has opposed affirmative action for so long that he doesn't know it's about inviting more people to meet standards, not lowering them. Or perhaps McCain is following the Bush administration habit, as in the Justice Department, of putting a job candidate's views on "God, guns and gays" ahead of competence. The difference is that McCain is filling a job one 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency.
So let's be clear: The culprit is John McCain. He may have chosen Palin out of change-envy, or a belief that women can't tell the difference between form and content, but the main motive was to please right-wing ideologues; the same ones who nixed anyone who is now or ever has been a supporter of reproductive freedom. If that were not the case, McCain could have chosen a woman who knows what a vice president does and who has thought about Iraq; someone like Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison or Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine. McCain could have taken a baby step away from right-wing patriarchs who determine his actions, right down to opposing the Violence Against Women Act.
Palin's value to those patriarchs is clear: She opposes just about every issue that women support by a majority or plurality. She believes that creationism should be taught in public schools but disbelieves global warming; she opposes gun control but supports government control of women's wombs; she opposes stem cell research but approves "abstinence-only" programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually transmitted diseases and abortions; she tried to use taxpayers' millions for a state program to shoot wolves from the air but didn't spend enough money to fix a state school system with the lowest high-school graduation rate in the nation; she runs with a candidate who opposes the Fair Pay Act but supports $500 million in subsidies for a natural gas pipeline across Alaska; she supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, though even McCain has opted for the lesser evil of offshore drilling. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.
I don't doubt her sincerity. As a lifetime member of the National Rifle Assn., she doesn't just support killing animals from helicopters, she does it herself. She doesn't just talk about increasing the use of fossil fuels but puts a coal-burning power plant in her own small town. She doesn't just echo McCain's pledge to criminalize abortion by overturning Roe vs. Wade, she says that if one of her daughters were impregnated by rape or incest, she should bear the child. She not only opposes reproductive freedom as a human right but implies that it dictates abortion, without saying that it also protects the right to have a child.
So far, the major new McCain supporter that Palin has attracted is James Dobson of Focus on the Family. Of course, for Dobson, "women are merely waiting for their husbands to assume leadership," so he may be voting for Palin's husband.
Being a hope-a-holic, however, I can see two long-term bipartisan gains from this contest.
Republicans may learn they can't appeal to right-wing patriarchs and most women at the same time. A loss in November could cause the centrist majority of Republicans to take back their party, which was the first to support the Equal Rights Amendment and should be the last to want to invite government into the wombs of women.
And American women, who suffer more because of having two full-time jobs than from any other single injustice, finally have support on a national stage from male leaders who know that women can't be equal outside the home until men are equal in it. Barack Obama and Joe Biden are campaigning on their belief that men should be, can be and want to be at home for their children.
This could be huge.
CLICK
HERE TO REPLY! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
TOPIC
DETAIL |
|
|
| Posted
on 9/9/2008 11:51:46 AM
with 0
replies |
|
John McCain's choice of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as running mate shows how desperate he is to distract attention from the fact that he is a cranky old man with nothing to offer but more of the same. Palin is a blatant pander for the women's vote. He must think we have the collective IQ of a Tampax.
Sure, Palin is cool -- she's pretty and vivacious and athletic, a former beauty queen who runs marathons, hunts , fishes and eats mooseburgers, plus she's got five kids with unusual names like Willow and Track, including a newborn with Down's syndrome. I feel tired just thinking of what her daily life must be like, and if she were my neighbor I would probably like her a lot. It shows how deeply feminism has penetrated American culture that even anti-choice, right-wing-Christian women are breaking out of the old sugary-submissive pastel-suited stereotype. And if life were a Lifetime movie, Palin would do just fine running the country should McCain keel over. Girls can do anything! and look great doing it!
But seriously. Vice President? After a stint as the mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, a town of less than 8000, and barely two years as governor of a state with more grizzly bears than people? She makes Obama's resume look as thick as Winston Churchill's.
Here's the reality: Palin is a rightwing-Christian anti-choice extremist who opposes abortion for any reason whasoever, except to save the life of the girl or woman. No exception even for rape, incest, or the health of the woman. No exception for a ten-year-old, a woman carrying a fetus with no chance of life, a woman on the edge of suicide-- let alone the woman who is not ready to be a parent, who is escaping domestic violence, who is already stretched to the limit as a single mother. She wants to force over one million women and girls a year to give birth against their will and judgment. She wants to use the magnificent freedom the women's movement has won for her at tremendous cost and struggle--the movement that won her the right to run those marathons and run Alaska -- to take away the freedom of every other woman in the country.
Her selection does not tell us McCain is a "maverick" who is just stringing the Christian right along, wink-wink. It tells us that he has thrown in his lot with James Dobson, the Family Research Council, the Catholic hierarchy and others for whom criminalizing abortion is the number-one issue. His record of votes against abortion and birth control--125 votes out of 130 in his congresssional and Senate career-- apparently wasn't quite enough for them. By choosing Palin, he wins their enthusiastic support.
McCain is gambling that women will vote their gender, and not their interests.
I expect pro-choice women will see through this gambit pretty fast. If not, we really are as dumb as he thinks we are.
CLICK
HERE TO REPLY! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
TOPIC
DETAIL |
|
|
| Posted
on 6/6/2008 9:35:44 AM
with 0
replies |
|
i am starting to feel that all men are bipolar if we call you because we want to hear your voice and express how we feel to you, you think we are "emotional" and "needy"( i had this happen to me a few times in the past and now its hard for me to express how i feel to a man cause i fear he will run away.) if we hardly call, act busy, and are not really open about our feelings yall get confused and think that we are not feeling you( these are probs that i face now cause i try my best not to be labeled "emotional" or "needy" like i did in the past.) it seems like u can never win with men cause either way they find a problem with me. another issue i have is, when you give the puss up fast they lose respect for you or treat you different. and when you dont give it up they think your stingy and a fronter. whats really up with the contradictions? its very annoying and i am starting to get sick of men cause no matter what i do i never end up on top. its like men are very shifty they say they want a classy female but fall for the *** that breaks their heart. then they become bitter. another issue i have with men is they say they respect women who respect themselves but if you demand and expect a guy to take you out and treat you like a lady they think you are a diva/ gold digging, stuck up, entitled *107* and if you make a guy always have their way they lose respect for you and think that you are easy to control ( these are the ones that men love and marry ex. "white women" and "pushover women") at this point i dont know what to do cause it seems like these men are control freaks that want to have their cake and eat it too. whatever happened to give and take or 50/50 its a sad world out there for us single women if u have a good man u are blessed. but men y are yall like that? ladies u can respond too.if i dont get to the bottom of this i will always have bad relationships someone please tell me what do men want.
CLICK
HERE TO REPLY! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
TOPIC
DETAIL |
|
|
| Posted
on 7/5/2008 12:10:15 PM
with 0
replies |
|
Bio: Re-Re is 20 years old and has quite a background: white, Brazilian, italian and latina. She was born in California, raised in Gainsville, Flordia and now is living in Louisville,Ky. She will be relocating in Miami shortly.
She has a bit of experience in magazines. She has been in a fashion bug, fashion show in Louisville,Ky, so fly fashion show in Lexington,ky, Sean John fashion show in NY, done many Dj mixtape covers & flyers here in Kentucky. I have been in a few local magazines here in Kentucky.
Re-Re is open to music videos,t.v.shows,magazines,calenders,car shows,runway shows etc. Since she was 6 she knew she wanted to pursue acting and would love to have a spot in a movie or t.v. show one day, she says.
Re-Re is 5"8 with measurements 36c-24-35 she works out on a daily basis to stay in shape. She loves to stay fit & is very athletic.
Re-Re is willing to travel if expenses are paid. She hope's to become very successful throughout her career and get a chance in Maxim & Smooth magazine as well as other various popular magazines.
To book Re-Re for any event, please send an e-mail to :
joyem87@yahoo.com
CLICK
HERE TO REPLY! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
